Home / Topics / 2026 Book-to-AI-Topics Synchronization Register

2026 Book-to-AI-Topics Synchronization Register

N/A Ready source map packet

Topic: 2026 Book-to-AI-Topics Synchronization Register

Purpose

This register prevents research developed or corrected during preparation of Henry Neville and the Works of Shakespeare from remaining trapped in the book project. It records the governing state of each material finding and routes readers to the live topic that now contains it.

Historical raw files, transcriptions, and dated research passes are preserved. Current topic packets, generated indexes, and factbooks must follow this register when older material conflicts with it.

Canonical corpus control

The sole canonical Neville letter corpus is:

[local source path removed]

Earlier corpus versions remain valid only as declared historical inputs to frozen studies. They must not be called “current.”

Source-control position

This register does not replace the sources or reasoning in the affected topics. It records which topic controls each claim and whether the finding is included, limited, or excluded. Public authorities remain in the linked packets.

Synchronization matrix

Finding or correctionGoverning stateLive topic
Jonson CIX controlsCorrected the writer-honoree census from the obsolete 6/20 and 8/20 summary to the final ledger's 10/20 strong, 12/20 strong-plus-plausible, and 13/20 broadly dialogic results; added the missing 20,482-comparison Jonson–Sonnets rhyme census and the Robert Parry 1597 negative controlBen Jonson
Davies / Sonnet 17 controlThe topic already contained the final narrow positive result (Neville poem first among 33 same-form Davies controls) and the negative 45-work broader control; its missing Chapter 38 routing has now been restoredDavies and Neville
Blind affinity studyNew topic created. 180 frozen features, 239 plays, positive 0.502 SD effect; primary add-one p = 0.054797; exploratory positive, not confirmatoryBlind 239-play study
Diplomatic chronologyUpdated with 21-term four-period rates, 1601–03 maximum, leave-one-term/work stability, failed unrestricted window scan, and failed network controlsDiplomatic vocabulary
Merry Wives / Elizabeth StileUpdated with father/stepmother identities, mother's 1573 death, younger Neville's probable European absence, primary pamphlets, Privy Council control, Dell's independent scholarship, and Martin's exact wordingMerry Wives; Windsor witch trials
Merry Wives 527-play name-networkCorrected from seven to eight families by restoring the Colnbrook/Colebrook spelling family; Reading remains excluded as ambiguous; Merry Wives 8 families/47 tokens versus comparison maximum 3Forest-office and venery screen; local context
John ChamberUpdated to keep Queen title-page dedication separate from the full Latin Neville prefatory poem and to foreground Neville's repeated publication requestsJohn Chamber; Barlaam/Logistica
George CarletonCorrected to one continuous A2r–A3r Neville poem; title page is not a second poem; Muses/buskin/poet/protection language preservedGeorge Carleton
FitzgeoffreyPromoted into cumulative printed-witness pattern; Aonii Nevilli controlled as Muse-associated, not silently expanded to playwrightFitzgeoffrey III.41
Southampton's adulthoodAlready synchronized before book completion: full age on 6 October 1594; both narrative-poem dedications precede majority; majority distinguished from liveryNeville and Southampton
Strachey disputeUpdated to primary evidence plus established historical/editorial scholarship; Stritmatter and Tom Reedy excluded; Bullough cannot be credited indirectly; Vaughan identifiedThe Tempest
Audley End annotationsPublic boundary fixed: no unpublished item-level annotations; hand/provenance unresolved; internal packet remains public-excludedAudley End Tacitus
Hall's ChronicleRemoved from the evidence architecture. No relevant Audley End Hall's Chronicle exists; an unrelated EarlyPrint comparison hit is not a source-book claimSource books; Timon
Holinshed / William KilligrewWilliam is Anne Killigrew Neville's paternal uncle, not her brother or Neville's brother-in-law; Kansas copy is not Audley End; annotations unattributedKilligrew Holinshed
Bacon kinshipAlready synchronized: Neville's stepmother Elizabeth Bacon was Francis Bacon's half-sister; Neville's wife Anne Killigrew was Bacon's first cousin through the Cooke sistersFrancis Bacon; Elizabeth Bacon; Anne Killigrew Neville
Pigafetta identity / Vienna source laneCorrected the book to separate Filippo, the 1582 young Mr Nevill acquaintance with a Turkey/Judea book, from Marc'Antonio, author of the 1585 Vienna–Constantinople Itinerario. The Vienna detail is contextual print evidence, not a documented Neville access lanePigafetta identity packet; Measure for Measure; Cobham introductions
Love's MartyrRetained only as standalone archival print research; expressly excluded from the Neville authorship book and its evidence rankingsRare-phrase transmission
HendiadysNew controlled topic created and Chapters 13 and 24 updated. Canonical v22 letters are sparse (3 secure, 8 inclusive in 131,988 words); the Confession, Case, and Advice concentrate the figure (4 secure, 8 inclusive in 6,981 words). The older Windebank zeal classification is superseded. Wright's broad distribution is replicated, while Q1/Q2/F1 receive separate witness countsHendiadys controls and Hamlet witnesses

Evidence-state rules carried forward from the book

  1. Documented fact, inference, and hypothesis remain separate. A network path is not proof of transmission; a listed book is not proof of acquisition by Henry Neville; a shared word is not authorship evidence by itself.
  2. Original quantitative research reports failed controls. The blind study failed its fixed primary threshold. The diplomatic study's unrestricted best-window scan and local-network analyses failed. Those results may not be omitted from later summaries.
  3. Historical freezes remain frozen. A v15 or v13 analytical input is not silently rerun or relabelled as v22. A v22 replication must be a new sensitivity analysis.
  4. Public-source discipline governs publication. research sources may guide discovery and preserve computations, but reader-facing historical claims require public, auditable authority.
  5. Audley End confidentiality is substantive. The public-exclusion flag is not cosmetic; no unpublished item-level annotation detail may leak into generated public products.
  6. Partisan authorship literature does not set the scholarly baseline. Source disputes are controlled by primary evidence and serious field scholarship.

Already-correct topics confirmed in this audit

Maintenance rule

After any further book correction or original analysis, update the affected direct topic first, add or revise a row here, validate the corpus, regenerate TOPIC INDEX and TOPIC MASTER INDEX, and rebuild the ordinary, public, and internal factbooks. A book-only correction is not complete until this cycle has been run.

Quoted source passages

Not applicable. This is an operational register; quotations belong in the controlled topic packets.

Citations

See the linked topic packets in the synchronization matrix. Each material claim must retain its own public citation there.

Notes on access

The register is public-safe. Its absolute corpus path and local output path are internal operational controls and are removed by the public factbook sanitizer.