Home / Topics / Henry Neville's Italic Handwriting

Henry Neville's Italic Handwriting

Lead Draft lead packet

Topic: Henry Neville's Italic Handwriting

The packet preserves a large image set of handwriting examples drawn from multiple dates and document types.
The image index identifies example groups connected to source filenames such as SP 12/270, SP 78/44, SP 78/43, PRO 30/50/2/52-53, Windebank examples, Julius Caesar examples, and Tower-letter comparisons.
As preserved, the packet functions best as a comparative image bank rather than as a fully cited archival handwriting dossier.

“Neville mostly wrote using secretary hand.”

“he signed his name in italic, wrote Latin in italic, and sometimes wrote placenames and people's names in italic.”

“Document formality”

“Language”

“Purpose”

“Time period”

“approximately 1591 to 1612”

“February 1599 letter to Thomas Windebank”

“1600 letter to Robert Cecil”

“1591 document”

“Letters to Julius Caesar”

“July 1602 letter from the Tower of London”

“1605 letter to Thomas Windebank”

“Despite significant variation within and between documents, these documents were written by the same person.”

“This supports broader research claims about Neville's literary connections and his role as an annotator of classical texts.”

“Neville mostly wrote using secretary hand.”
“he signed his name in italic, wrote Latin in italic, and sometimes wrote placenames and people's names in italic.”
“Document formality”
“Language”
“Purpose”
“Time period”
“approximately 1591 to 1612”
“February 1599 letter to Thomas Windebank”
“1600 letter to Robert Cecil”
“1591 document”
“Letters to Julius Caesar”
“July 1602 letter from the Tower of London”
“1605 letter to Thomas Windebank”
“Despite significant variation within and between documents, these documents were written by the same person.”

Feinstein, Ken. “Examples of Henry Neville's Italic Handwriting.” kenfeinstein.blogspot.com, 20 Jun. 2023, https://kenfeinstein.blogspot.com/2023/06/examples-of-henry-nevilles-italic.html. Local preservation: blog_neville_italic_handwriting_2023-06-20.md.
northumberland_manuscript.md, related packet for handwriting comparison work.
alibech_rustico_and_boccaccios_decameron.md, related packet because the blog includes Alibech examples among the handwriting witnesses.
audley_end_tacitus_and_henry_neville.md, related packet for annotated-book handwriting comparison.

Images 1-2: PRO SP 12/270 f.68, as preserved in the source filenames.
Images 3-4: PRO SP 78/44 f.186 / f.186d, as preserved in the source filenames.
Image 5: Boulogne example, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Images 6-7: Alibech / Rustico example, as labeled in the preserved source filenames.
Images 8-9: CP 79/31/1a, as preserved in the source filenames.
Images 10-11: Julius Caesar example, as labeled in the preserved source filenames.
Images 13-14: dedimus potestatem / Tower-letter comparison, as labeled in the preserved source filenames.
Image 15: Windebank example, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Images 23, 28-29: SP 78/43 examples, as preserved in the source filenames.
Image 30: July letter, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Image 32: Cecil example, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Image 34: confession example, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Image 37: Lower example, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Image 39: Winwood letter / Chelsea example, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Image 40: Pawlet italic 1606, as labeled in the preserved source filename.
Images 42-43: PRO 30/50/2/52-53, as preserved in the source filenames.

This packet is a Ken Feinstein blog/image packet and should be used as a preserved handwriting-evidence set.
The packet’s main value is the assembled comparative baseline across multiple documents and dates.
The image index above is inferred from the preserved blog export’s source filenames; it is useful for orientation, but it is not yet a full archival citation layer for every document represented in the packet.
The underlying baseline letters still need to be cited document by document if this packet is to function as a full independently verifiable handwriting reference.
The handwriting-identification conclusions in this packet therefore remain at the Ken Feinstein analysis layer unless and until each baseline document is cited directly.