Cannons, Arden of Faversham, Troublesome Reign of King John, and King John
Topic: Cannons, Arden of Faversham, Troublesome Reign of King John, and King John
Source-Control Update, 2026-05-29
- This packet has been moved from
leadtomixed. The play-text witnesses for Troublesome Reign, Arden of Faversham, and King John are now partly checked against local EarlyPrint/EEBO and early-modern drama databases. The authorship inference remains interpretive. - The 1591 EarlyPrint/TCP witness
A68278verifies the Troublesome Reign cannon passage quoted by the blog: the line hasCannons crackandbattlements of heauenin the old-spelling text. - The 1611 EarlyPrint/TCP witness
A04520is the combined "first and second part" quarto whose title page includesWritten by W. Sh.It repeats the cannon passage and also verifies the part-two furnace passage in old spelling:fornace seuen-fold hote. - The local Early Modern Plays database splits Troublesome Reign into
PLAY_ID 341andPLAY_ID 342. In that normalized corpus, Part 1 has onecannonhit and threeorisonshits; Part 2 has onefurnacehit and oneorisonshit. This supports the blog's "four times"orisonscount across the two parts. - The 1592 EarlyPrint/TCP witness
A20951verifies the Arden of Faversham cannon passage:cannons burst,ruinated wall, and the nearbyforge distressefull looksphrase. It also has a separateCannon bulletpassage. - The King John side is controlled by the related hardened packet. The safe wording is not that King John has an exact
ordnancereading, but that it has dense cannon/artillery/bullet language and oneordinanceline in the Angiers siege scene. - Do not use this packet as a proof of Neville/Shakespeare authorship of Troublesome Reign or Arden. The Casson, Peele, and apocrypha-authorship claims still need direct secondary-source and comparative checks.
1. Verified Sourced Facts
Bibliographic and Corpus Controls
- EarlyPrint
local EarlyPrint databaseidentifiesA68278as the 1591 The troublesome raigne of Iohn King of England, authorUnknown. - EarlyPrint
local EarlyPrint databaseidentifiesA04520as the 1611 combined The first and second part of the troublesome raigne of Iohn King of England, authorUnknown; the title metadata includesWritten by W. Sh. - Folger Shakespeare Documented confirms the attribution history: the play was first published anonymously in 1591; the 1611 quarto adds
Written by W.Sh.; the 1622 quarto expands the attribution toW. Shakespeare. - Folger Shakespeare Documented also reports that Brian Vickers's George Peele case is followed by Charles Forker's 2011 Revels edition. That supports "Peele is a serious scholarly attribution lane," not "Peele is settled fact" for this packet.
- EarlyPrint
local EarlyPrint databaseidentifiesA20951as the 1592 Arden of Faversham, authoranon. - EarlyPrint
local EarlyPrint databaseidentifiesA11954as the 1623 First Folio, Mr. VVilliam Shakespeares comedies, histories, & tragedies, author William Shakespeare. - The local Early Modern Plays database records:
PLAY_ID 341,1 The Troublesome Reign of King John,1591,14,384tokens.PLAY_ID 342,2 The Troublesome Reign of King John,1591,9,883tokens.PLAY_ID 378,Arden of Faversham,1590,20,200tokens.PLAY_ID 505,King John,1596,20,775tokens.
Troublesome Reign
- Local EarlyPrint FTS search
word_text:"Cannons crack"returnsA68278only among the returned exact hits. RawA68278text verifies the old-spelling passage withdamned orisons,Cannons crack, andbattlements of heauen. - Local EarlyPrint FTS search
word_text:"damned orisons"returns two witnesses:A68278(1591) andA04520(1611). - Local EarlyPrint FTS search
word_text:"battlements of heauen"returns17rows, includingA68278andA04520. This phrase should not be treated as unique to Troublesome Reign without a narrower date/genre control. - Raw
A04520verifies the furnace passage in the second part:fornace seuen-fold hote. Local FTS confirms it withword_text:"fornace seuenfold hote"andlemma_text:"furnace sevenfold hot", both returningA04520. - The local Early Modern Plays database gives these normalized controls:
- Part 1 has one
cannonhit:the echo of a cannon's crack discharged against the battlements of heaven. - Part 1 has three
orisonshits, includingdamned orisons. - Part 2 has one
furnacehit:That rageth as the furnace sevenfold hot. - Part 2 has one
orisonshit.
Arden of Faversham
- Raw
A20951verifies the old-spelling cannon passage in Arden of Faversham:cannons burst,ruinated wall, and the nearbyforge distressefull looks. - Local EarlyPrint FTS search
word_text:"ruinated wall"returnsA20951only among returned exact hits. - Local EarlyPrint FTS search
word_text:"cannons burst"returnsA20951andA06270(A Larum for London, 1602), so the phrase is not unique but the Arden witness is real. - The local Early Modern Plays database records two
cannonhits in Arden: thecannon's burstpassage and a separateCannon bulletpassage. It also records threebullethits and one substantivegun powderhit.
King John and Neville Ordnance Control
- The related hardened King John ordnance packet confirms that local Folger King John has dense cannon, artillery, bullet, battery, and iron-indignation language in the Angiers siege scene.
- That packet also corrects the inherited
ordnanceclaim: local Folger King John has no exactordnancehit; it hasordinanceonce in2.1. - Raw
A11954First Folio text supports the same guardrail. The Angiers passage hasThe Canons haue their bowels full of wrath,Their Iron indignation, andBy the compulsion of their Ordinance. - The Neville/BRO ordnance side is controlled through the related Mayfield and King John ordnance packets, especially D/EN/O23 documents concerning cast-iron ordnance and Neville's 1599 diplomatic letter about the casting of
50 or 60 peeces. This overview should cite those packets rather than repeat their full source apparatus.
Demoted or Unchecked Claims
- The Ken Feinstein blog claim that cannon imagery can test apocryphal Shakespeare/Neville authorship remains an interpretive lead.
- The John Casson attribution claim has not been directly checked in this packet.
- The Peele comparison examples listed in the blog have not yet been checked against direct Peele texts here.
- The Edward III cannon material in the blog is not structurally necessary for this packet and should probably be separated into an apocrypha/cannon-imagery packet if used.
2. Ken Feinstein Twitter and Blog Information
- A Ken Feinstein blog post dated
21 Nov. 2018states:
“Mayfield manor and park had come into Neville hands through Neville’s mother, Elizabeth Gresham, and included a furnace used for casting iron ordnance.”
- The same post states:
“through most of the 1580s and 1597, Sir Henry Neville was intimately involved in the manufacture of ordinance (cannons).”
- The same post states:
“cannon imagery is a hallmark of Shakespeare's works”
- The same post states:
“When trying to determine whether a certain apocryphal work was actually written by Shakespeare/Neville, my first check is always for cannon imagery.”
- The same post states:
“John Casson suggests that the Troublesome Reign of King John was written by Neville/Shakespeare.”
- The same post states:
“A quarto of this play was published in 1591”
- The same post quotes The Troublesome Reign:
“As is the eccho of a Cannons crack / Dischargd against the battlements of heauen.”
- The same post states:
“Conventional wisdom is that George Peele wrote the play.”
- The same post states that the word
orisons:
“appears four times in the play and appears in several Shakespeare plays”
- Folger's Shakespeare Documented page for the
1611second edition of The Troublesome Reign of King John confirms that the play was first published anonymously in1591, that the 1611 quarto addedWritten by W.Sh., and that a 1622 quarto expanded that attribution toW. Shakespeare.
- Folgerpedia's King John page states that Shakespeare's King John was probably written in
1594-96, published in the1623First Folio, and that The Troublesome Reign of John King of England may be a source.
- Source check,
2026-05-29: the quoted Troublesome Reign cannon passage is verified directly inA68278andA04520. The furnace passage is verified directly inA04520and in normalized form in the local Early Modern Plays database, but a separate 1591 second-part page witness remains to be identified. - Source check,
2026-05-29: the blog'sorisonscount is supported in the local Early Modern Plays database as three hits in Part 1 and one hit in Part 2. - Source check,
2026-05-29: the Arden cannon passage is verified directly inA20951. - Source check,
2026-05-29: the King John ordnance wording requires correction toordinance, following the related hardened packet.
3. Citations
- Feinstein, Ken. "Cannons, Arden of Faversham, Troublesome Reign of King John, and King John." kenfeinstein.blogspot.com, 21 Nov. 2018, https://kenfeinstein.blogspot.com/2018/11/cannons-arden-of-faversham-troublesome.html. Local preservation: blog_cannons_arden_troublesome_reign_2018-11-21.md.
- Kirwan, Peter. “The Troublesome Reign of King John, second edition.” Shakespeare Documented, Folger Shakespeare Library, https://shakespearedocumented.folger.edu/resource/document/troublesome-reign-king-john-second-edition.
- “King John.” Folgerpedia, Folger Shakespeare Library, https://folgerpedia.folger.edu/King_John.
- Local Early Modern Plays database: local early modern plays database, especially
PLAY_ID 341,342,378, and505. - Local EarlyPrint corpus database: local EarlyPrint database, especially
A68278,A04520,A20951, andA11954. - Local EarlyPrint FTS database: local EarlyPrint FTS index. Checks used include
word_text:"Cannons crack",word_text:"damned orisons",word_text:"battlements of heauen",word_text:"fornace seuenfold hote",lemma_text:"furnace sevenfold hot",word_text:"cannons burst", andword_text:"ruinated wall". - cannons_in_the_canon_iron_ordnance_in_king_john.md, hardened related packet controlling the King John and BRO ordnance lane.
- mayfield_manor_and_ironworks.md, related Mayfield packet.
- cannons_in_the_canon_blast_furnaces.md, related blast-furnace packet.
4. Notes on Access
- This is now a mixed source-control packet, not a blog-only lead packet.
- This packet preserves a Ken Feinstein blog post.
- The locally preserved Blogger export records no embedded images for this post.
- The Troublesome Reign and Arden play-text claims now have local database witnesses; the authorship claims do not.
- The exact EarlyPrint public/local corpus boundary matters. The local FTS and raw XML checks are independent local controls, not a substitute for final page-image collation from quarto scans.
- The bibliographic relationship between Troublesome Reign and Shakespeare's King John is real and source-discussed, but the cannon-imagery/authorship extension remains a Ken Feinstein interpretive lead until direct textual comparison and secondary scholarship are checked.