Richard II and the Essex Rising
Topic: Richard II and the Essex Rising
1. Verified Sourced Facts
- Paul E. J. Hammer writes:
“On the afternoon of 7 February 1601 - the day before the so-called Essex Rising - the Lord Chamberlain s Men certainly staged a play ‘of Kyng Harry the iiiith and of the kyllyng of Kyng Richard the Second’ at the insistence of certain gentlemen who were to be involved in the events of the following day”
- Hammer also writes:
“the precise identity of the play remains uncertain”
- Alexandra Gajda writes:
“Several of Essex’s friends and followers had spent the afternoon watching the Lord Chamberlain’s Men act a specially commissioned play at the Globe Theatre of ‘Kyng Henry the iiiith, and of the kyllyng of Kyng Richard the Second’.”
- Gajda identifies the secret inner group at Essex House that night as including:
“the earl of Southampton”
“Henry Cuffe”
- Hammer writes of the surviving evidence:
“Elizabethan authorities regarded the play of insufficient importance to investigate the players involved”
- Hammer also writes:
“Although a series of compelling reasons seem to make Shakespeare’s Richard II a desirable choice for Sir Charles Percy and his friends to watch a week before Essex’s expected aristocratic intervention at court, Shakespeare’s Richard II hardly offers the sort of unalloyed endorsement of Bolingbroke’s actions which the earl’s anxious followers might be expected to want to see”
- The local EEBO corpus records the 1597 printed play as:
“The tragedie of King Richard the second As it hath beene publikely acted by the right Honourable the Lorde Chamberlaine his Seruants.”
- The local Essex-rebellion wiki note states that the Essex source cluster includes:
“Francis Bacon's accounts”
“Henry Neville's documents: Full confession and apology/justification for his role, recorded in Winwood's Memorials (Volume 1, pp. 302-304)”
- Neville's
2 March 1601confession to Robert Cecil is now available locally through the O'Donnell DOCX transcription and in the Neville Letters Corpus asletter_135, categorydocument, titleNeville Confession. This supersedes the earlier treatment of the staged Gale PDF as an unread image-only lead for the confession text.
- Edward Paleit places Cuffe's recruitment of Henry Neville inside the wider early modern reading of Lucan's Caesar. Paleit quotes Neville's deposition that Cuffe cited:
“Arma tenenti, omnia dat qui iusta negat.”
- Paleit argues that the tag could be read as placing Essex in the position of Lucan's Caesar: an alienated, militarily powerful subject encouraged to answer political exclusion by force.
- Source-hardening check of Paleit's PDF adds an important caution: the Lucan tag is adjacent Essex-political-reading evidence, not evidence for which play was performed on
7 February 1601. Paleit is explaining how Cuffe's classical quotation could be heard as Caesarist justification for armed action; Hammer/Gajda remain the better controls for the Richard II performance itself.
- Paleit also distinguishes witnesses. Neville's deposition and Camden's memory of Cuffe's trial keep the Lucan tag in the Cuffe-to-Neville recruitment lane. Thomas Fuller's later notice makes the more dramatic claim that the line was spoken to Essex himself; that is important reception history but weaker as direct event evidence.
- The Calendar of State Papers execution-speech item for Cuffe records that Cuffe was charged with seducing Sir Henry Neville and answered that he "drew him into that unfortunate action." This strengthens the Cuffe/Neville/Essex evidence layer adjacent to the Richard II performance, while remaining distinct from the question of which play was staged.
- Source-hardening check of the staged Gale/CSPD PDF confirms that Cuffe's execution speech is not just a later paraphrase: the calendar records the charge about seducing Neville, Cuffe's answer, and the closing phrase that Cuffe asked pardon principally of Sir H. Nevill.
- Cyndia Susan Clegg argues that the Richard II deposition/parliament scene should be read in the context of Elizabethan press censorship and the succession controversy surrounding Robert Parsons's A conference about the next succession. Her article is useful because it ties Richard II censorship questions to the same political environment in which Neville was operating as ambassador/intelligence correspondent.
- Clegg directly states that Henry Neville brought the Jesuit/Infanta succession issue to Robert Cecil's attention in a letter dated
27 June 1599, claiming that the Jesuit party was taking the Infanta's side after Parsons's book. Neville proposed that support for the Infanta's title be used as a loyalty test for priests and recusants.
2. Ken Feinstein Twitter and Blog Information
- No Ken Feinstein Twitter/blog material is isolated in this packet at present.
3. Quoted Source Text
Hammer
- “On the afternoon of 7 February 1601 - the day before the so-called Essex Rising - the Lord Chamberlain s Men certainly staged a play ‘of Kyng Harry the iiiith and of the kyllyng of Kyng Richard the Second’”
- “the precise identity of the play remains uncertain”
- “Elizabethan authorities regarded the play of insufficient importance to investigate the players involved”
Gajda
- “watching the Lord Chamberlain’s Men act a specially commissioned play at the Globe Theatre of ‘Kyng Henry the iiiith, and of the kyllyng of Kyng Richard the Second’.”
EEBO title witness
- “The tragedie of King Richard the second”
- “As it hath beene publikely acted by the right Honourable the Lorde Chamberlaine his Seruants.”
Local Essex source map
- “Francis Bacon's accounts”
- “Henry Neville's documents: Full confession and apology/justification for his role, recorded in Winwood's Memorials (Volume 1, pp. 302-304)”
- “my duty and conscience binding me”
- “touching the designs and the enterprises of the late Earl of Essex”
Cuffe / Lucan / Neville
- “Arma tenenti, omnia dat qui iusta negat.”
- “Sir Henry Neville”
- “Caesar crossing the Rubicon”
- “he must confess he drew him into that unfortunate action”
- “Then they charged Mr. Cuffe with seducing Sir H. Neville”
Clegg / succession censorship / Neville
- “Henry Neville brought this situation to Robert Cecil's attention in a letter of 27June 1599”
- “Priests and recusants, when apprehended, should be examined whether they have not been solicited or solicited others to subscribe to the infanta's title.”
4. Citations
- Hammer, Paul E. J. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, the Play of 7 February 1601, and the Essex Rising.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 1, Spring 2008, pp. 1-35. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40210244.
- Gajda, Alexandra. “The Essex Rising of 1601.” The Earl of Essex and Late Elizabethan Political Culture. Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 27-66. Oxford Academic, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199699681.003.0002.
- Shakespeare, William. The tragedie of King Richard the second. 1597.
TCP A11994. Oxford Text Archive, https://ota.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/repository/xmlui/handle/20.500.12024/A11994. - “Essex Rebellion.” Henry Neville Research Wiki source note preserved locally at wiki_essex_rebellion.md.
- “Essex Rebellion.” local Twitter/source note preserved at twitter_Essex_Rebellion.md.
- Neville, Henry. Confession to Robert Cecil,
2 March 1601. Local DOCX transcription: [Nevill to Cecil, 1600 [= 1601].03.02.docx](/Users/kenf/Neville%20Book/08_Neville_Letters_Vocabulary/Nevill%20to%20Cecil%2C%201600%20%5B%3D%201601%5D.03.02.docx). Extracted text: Nevill_to_Cecil_1601_03_02_ODonnell_transcription.txt. - Neville Letters Corpus. Version 8. XML corpus. Confession encoded as
letter_135, dated1601-03-02, recipientRobert Cecil, titleNeville Confession: Neville_Letters_Corpus_v8.xml. - Paleit, Edward. “The ‘Caesarist’ Reader and Lucan’s Bellum Civile, ca. 1590 to 1610.” Review of English Studies, new series, vol. 62, no. 254, Apr. 2011, pp. 212-240. Staged PDF: 23016463_Paleit_Caesarist_Reader_Lucan.pdf.
- Clegg, Cyndia Susan. “‘By the choise and inuitation of al the realme’: Richard II and Elizabethan Press Censorship.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 4, Winter 1997, pp. 432-448. Staged PDF: Clegg-ByChoiseInuitation-1997.pdf.
- Speech of Mr. Cuffe at his execution for treason. Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, Elizabeth I, 1601-1603 with Addenda 1547-1565, vol. CCLXXIX, no. 25, March 13, 1601. Document ref.
SP 12/279 f.35. Staged PDF: GALE_MC4304600028.pdf.
5. Notes on Access
- This packet is a starting file for a larger Essex cluster. It now has a local transcription/XML path for Neville's
2 March 1601confession, but it does not yet provide a full close reading of that confession in this packet body. - The Hammer article is available locally as 40210244.pdf.
- The Gajda chapter is available locally as essex_chapter_1.pdf.
- The Richard II title witness is taken from the local EEBO corpus metadata for
TCP A11994. - Update, 2026-04-16: the Lucan/Cuffe/Neville point is now supported by Paleit's article and by the Cuffe execution calendar item. The packet should still avoid collapsing this into the Richard II performance claim: the Lucan material strengthens the Essex political-reading context, not the identity of the play performed on 7 February 1601.
- Source-hardening result,
2026-04-28: Paleit should be used for the Caesarist-reading frame and for the source-layer distinction among Neville's deposition, Camden's account of Cuffe's trial, and Fuller's later notice. Do not use Fuller as if it were equivalent to the deposition. - Source-hardening result,
2026-04-27: the Cuffe execution PDF strongly supports the Cuffe/Neville personal-political link, but it should remain analytically separate from the performance-identification question. - Update, 2026-04-16: Clegg adds an important Neville-specific
1599succession-politics lead. The next task is to locate and extract Neville's27 June 1599letter to Cecil directly, rather than relying only on Clegg's summary.