Home / Topics / Filippo Pigafetta's Egypt–Sinai Relation and Cobham's 1582 Candidate Book

Filippo Pigafetta's Egypt–Sinai Relation and Cobham's 1582 Candidate Book

Mixed Ready evidence packet

Filippo Pigafetta's Egypt–Sinai Relation and Cobham's Candidate Book

Essential Evidence

Cobham's calendared 17 September 1582 letter says of the traveller introduced the previous month as Filippo Pigafetta:

He has written a book of his 'voyage' passed in Turkey and Judea, which he desires her Majesty may see.

This sentence is the controlling description. No surviving title should replace it unless the original letter and candidate text support the identification. British History Online, item 339.

The leading known candidate is Filippo's relation of his 1576–77 journey through Ottoman Egypt and Arabia to Mount Sinai. It fits the named author, date, manuscript form and Turkish political content. It does not literally fit Judea. The result is a narrowed candidate problem, not a solved title.

Sourced Facts

Work identity and title

The University of Padua Echos record gives the extended title:

Relazione o Viaggio del Signor Filippo Pigafetta Nobile Vicentino d'intorno al viaggio dell'Egitto, dell'Arabia. Del Mar Rosso e del Monte Sinai, dove si descrive partitamente il sito di quelle Province, l'aumento del Nilo, le Piramidi, le fabbriche antiche, adattando i nomi moderni agli antichi, le forze militari del Turco, che tiene nell'Egitto, nell'Arabia Felice, e nel Mar Rosso e nell'Etiopia, e insomma dichiaransi tutte le particolarità pertinenti ad uomo di Stato. Data alla Santità di Nostro Signore Sisto Quinto.

Working translation of its scope: a relation of Egypt, Arabia, the Red Sea and Mount Sinai, describing geography, Nile flooding, pyramids and antiquities, Ottoman forces in Egypt, Arabia Felix, the Red Sea and Ethiopia, and matters pertinent to a statesman; the surviving presentation form is addressed to Sixtus V.

The title establishes Ottoman and state-information content. Its address to Sixtus V is a later presentation state, not proof that the same copy was intended for Elizabeth in 1582.

Journey chronology

Manuscript witnesses

The Echos source record identifies four principal witnesses:

The Bertoliana catalogue also describes a later Da Schio miscellany, MS 1815, containing Viaggio di Filippo Pigafetta dal Cairo al Monte Sinai, incipit Essendomi partito di Alessandria, fols. 1r–22v. This later compilation must not be counted as a fifth autograph witness without manuscript examination.

The Judea problem

Filippo's documented route is Egypt–Arabia–Sinai, not Judea. Pre-1600 English controls make it unsafe to call the words synonyms:

Possible explanations remain: Cobham summarized a Holy Land-adjacent journey loosely; Pigafetta described a different work; or another relation is lost or unidentified. None is yet proved.

Candidate Comparison

WorkExact author fitRoute fitForm by 1582Controlled conclusion
Egypt–Sinai relationYes, FilippoOttoman Egypt and Sinai; no JudeaManuscript relationLeading known candidate, unresolved mismatch
Marc'Antonio's ItinerarioNo, different PigafettaVienna–Constantinople; no JudeaManuscript later printed 1585Poor match
Filippo's Del regno di CandiaYesCrete and Ottoman threat; no voyage to JudeaManuscriptNot the described route
Filippo's Bessarion translationYesAnti-Ottoman subject, no voyagePrinted 1573Context only

Quoted Source Passages

Cobham's 21 August identification must be read with the September description:

There is also one Philippo Pigafetta, of 'Vinsentia,' a philosopher, who has likewise given me to understand he desires to go into England, being of young Mr Nevill's acquaintance.

British History Online, item 266.

Citations and Access Notes

The Echos and Bertoliana records control work and witness identity; they do not prove that a surviving witness is the object Cobham wanted Elizabeth to see.