Audley End Part 6: Henry Savile and Henry Neville's Annotations of Tacitus
Topic: Audley End Part 6: Henry Savile and Henry Neville's Annotations of Tacitus
1. Verified Sourced Facts
- The preserved post identifies the Tacitus volume as:
“a Justus Lipsius edition from 1574 containing both the Histories and Annals.”
- The packet preserves a local image set from Ken Feinstein’s
17 Dec. 2019Audley End Tacitus post.
- The Tacitus volume lacks direct attestation on the Billingbear Book List in the current packet.
- The working Billingbear transcription does contain other Tacitus entries, including
Tacitus et Paterculus (in uno) ... Paris 1608,C. Cornelii Taciti Opera ad exemplar Lipsii ... Paris 1599, andAnnals and History of Tacitus ... Lond. 1698. These entries show Tacitus in the later Billingbear library context, but they are not the specific1574Lipsius Audley End copy described by this packet.
2. Ken Feinstein Twitter and Blog Information
- A Ken Feinstein blog post dated
17 Dec. 2019states:
“a 1574 edition of Tacitus at Audley End bearing annotations from two distinct hands -- Henry Savile and Henry Neville.”
- The same post states:
“Though not listed on the Billingbear Book List, matching handwriting in other documented volumes from that collection suggests this book likely originated there.”
- The same post states:
“Two specific annotations on pages 149 and 161 are identified as Savile's work”
- The same post states that the comparison uses:
“a 1600 letter from Savile to Neville”
- The same post states:
“Most annotations appear in Neville's handwriting”
- The same post states:
“A distinctive annotation mark -- exactly the same mark as observed in Guicciardini's History of Italy -- appears multiple times”
- The same post states:
“this discovery as extraordinary, warranting substantial scholarly attention regarding manuscript annotations and translation history.”
3. Quoted Source Text
Ken Feinstein blog post, 17 Dec. 2019
- “a 1574 edition of Tacitus at Audley End bearing annotations from two distinct hands -- Henry Savile and Henry Neville.”
- “a Justus Lipsius edition from 1574 containing both the Histories and Annals.”
Working Billingbear transcription context
- “Tacitus et Paterculus (in uno) ... Paris 1608.”
- “C. Cornelii Taciti Opera ad exemplar Lipsii ... Paris 1599.”
- “Annals and History of Tacitus ... Lond. 1698.”
- “Though not listed on the Billingbear Book List, matching handwriting in other documented volumes from that collection suggests this book likely originated there.”
- “Two specific annotations on pages 149 and 161 are identified as Savile's work”
- “a 1600 letter from Savile to Neville”
- “Most annotations appear in Neville's handwriting”
- “A distinctive annotation mark -- exactly the same mark as observed in Guicciardini's History of Italy -- appears multiple times”
- “this discovery as extraordinary, warranting substantial scholarly attention regarding manuscript annotations and translation history.”
4. Citations
- Feinstein, Ken. “Part 6: Henry Savile and Henry Neville's Annotations of Tacitus.” kenfeinstein.blogspot.com, 17 Dec. 2019, https://kenfeinstein.blogspot.com/2019/12/part-6-henry-savile-and-henry-nevilles.html. Local preservation: blog_audley_end_part6_2019-12-17.md.
- Billingbear Book List Transcription. Working local transcription: Billingbear_Book_List_Transcription.md.
- audley_end_tacitus_and_henry_neville.md, related packet.
- henry_savile.md, related Savile packet.
5. Notes on Access
- This packet preserves a Ken Feinstein blog post and its local image set.
- The post’s attribution of the Tacitus hands is preserved as Ken Feinstein blog evidence.
- The specific
1574Lipsius Tacitus volume lacks direct attestation on the Billingbear Book List in the current packet. Its proposed Billingbear provenance therefore rests on handwriting and associated-volume arguments rather than on a direct Billingbear-list entry. The list does contain other Tacitus editions, which should be used only as contextual evidence of Tacitus in the later library. - audley_end_tacitus_and_henry_neville.md is the later and more detailed Tacitus packet and should be treated as the strongest current packet for this volume.
- 2026-04-21 web audit note: public text controls can verify Tacitus passages, but not the Audley End physical copy or annotation hands. Keep this as an earlier lead packet subordinate to the later Tacitus packet.
6. Local Images



















