Home / Topics / Digitized Books

Digitized Books

Mixed Ready source map packet

Topic: Digitized Books

Purpose and Source-Control Position

This is a curated access map, not an evidence packet in its own right. It identifies the three resources preserved on the Neville Research wiki's Digitized Books page, gives each a precise bibliographical identity, and routes interpretation to the packet that actually evaluates the source.

The hub should remain separate from top books and articles. Its narrower purpose is useful: it records public digital witnesses, copy-specific features, file sizes, identifiers, and the evidentiary limits of each link.

1. Florio's Montaigne, 1603

Exact edition

The Folger record confirms that this is the first English translation, in three books, with separate dated title pages for Books 2 and 3. It also distinguishes multiple Folger copies and their annotations rather than treating the 1603 Montaigne as a single undifferentiated object.

Public digital witness named by the wiki

The item metadata describes the copy as bearing extensive seventeenth-century pen, pencil, and red-crayon marks, a manuscript index, and corrections attributed to Florio. Those are copy-specific uploader assertions. The scan makes the marks observable, but the attribution of any correction as Florio's holograph requires a scholarly copy-census or handwriting authority before it is used as fact.

Safe use

2. Tacitus, Annales and Germania, 1612

Exact edition

The edition combines two translation histories:

The scan's title and dedication pages directly show the 1612 date and Greneway's address to Essex. The dedication begins:

“The worthinesse of this Authour well knowen vnto your Honour, putteth mee in some hope of pardon for my presumption.”

Public digital witness named by the wiki

Important correction

The locally indexed EarlyPrint item A13333 is the 1598 first English Annales, not this 1612 edition. It cannot serve as a page or textual control for copy-specific claims about the wiki's 1612 scan. The common Tacitus/Savile textual tradition is relevant, but the editions must remain distinct.

Interpretive use belongs in audley end tacitus and henry neville.

3. Saint-Omer First Folio Article

The wiki's Article on Nevill First Folio is:

The page is not the final state of the research. Its authorial warning says it represents a “non-definitive position” and directs readers to a corrected and expanded 2016 article on the P S stamp:

The controlling later synthesis is:

The 2015 article safely established only that the Folio appeared in the 1823 manuscript catalogue and that Jesuit provenance was probable rather than absolutely proven at that stage. The later research associates the Folio with a 1736 Thomas Nevill gift group and a Prefect of Studies reserve. Full analysis belongs in saint omer folio and thomas nevill.

4. Resource Table

wiki labelexact identitystable public witnesscontrolling packetevidentiary warning
1603 Florio Montaigne (UCLA)STC 18041; ESTC S111839IA `MontaigneImages`future Montaigne/source packetannotation and holograph attributions are copy-specific and need authority
1612 TacitusSTC 23646; ESTC S117625IA Tacitus scanaudley end tacitus and henry nevilledo not substitute the 1598 EarlyPrint transcription
Article on Nevill First FolioCottegnies and Venet, 2015open HTMLsaint omer folio and thomas nevillexplicitly non-definitive; use 2016 and 2017 updates

5. Local Research Assets

The dated source directory contains:

See RECEPTION ACCESS CLUSTER SOURCE PASS 2026 07 09.

6. Quoted Source Passages

The principal direct quotation in this access hub is Richard Greneway's 1612 Essex dedication opening, transcribed in section 2 from the Archive.org witness. The Saint-Omer article's authorial warning and the Montaigne/Tacitus edition statements are routed to their public records rather than re-quoted at length.

7. Notes on Access and Citation Rules

  1. Cite the bibliographical edition and the digitized copy separately.
  2. Use STC/ESTC records for edition identity; use Archive.org identifiers for the particular scan.
  3. Treat Archive.org OCR as a navigation layer, not a quotation authority where page images are available.
  4. Route interpretive claims to the dedicated topic packet rather than citing this access map as proof.
  5. When an online article identifies itself as preliminary or corrected, cite the later controlling study.

8. Original Wiki Record

The wiki page was valuable as a discovery list. This packet now supplies the source identities and hierarchy needed to use those links responsibly.