Home / Topics / Sir John Herbert: Second Secretary, Civil Lawyer, Linguist, and Neville's Boulogne Colleague

Sir John Herbert: Second Secretary, Civil Lawyer, Linguist, and Neville's Boulogne Colleague

Mixed Ready evidence packet

Sir John Herbert

Source-Control Summary

Herbert's office in the Boulogne commission was checked against the public Winwood page image. His biography was controlled through the Dictionary of Welsh Biography, and the secretarial memorandum through Prothero's public page-image edition. The memorandum is attributed probably, not absolutely, to Herbert in that edition.

Why Herbert matters

John Herbert was appointed to the Privy Council and made second secretary of state immediately before joining Neville's Boulogne commission. The timing means the mission was not simply another diplomatic assignment in his career: it helped define the responsibilities of a newly created high office.

Herbert brought four forms of expertise to Neville's team:

Identity and genealogy

The Dictionary of Welsh Biography identifies Herbert as the second son of Matthew Herbert of Swansea and a descendant of the Herbert line of Ewyas. This genealogy should not be confused with the later Herberts of Cherbury or with the earls of Pembroke, although the lines belonged to the wider Herbert kindred.

He married Margaret Morgan and had one daughter.

Education and early service

Herbert entered the College of Advocates, worked in Admiralty jurisdiction, and became a Master of Requests. He took the D.C.L. at Oxford in 1587 and was chosen to dispute before Elizabeth during her 1592 visit.

His reputation for languages led to:

This background made him particularly well suited to a conference in which Latin commission forms, French and Spanish-Netherlands diplomacy, merchant claims, maritime injuries, and questions of precedence converged.

Appointment and Boulogne

Herbert was appointed second secretary in April 1600 and sworn to the Privy Council on 10 May. He then joined Neville, Beale, and Edmondes.

Elizabeth's formal commission calls him:

“Secundi Secretarii nostri”

The document also identifies him as a member of the Privy Council. His place between Neville and Beale in the commission reflects office, not authorship rank.

The four-man team should be understood functionally:

CommissionerPrincipal documented capacity
Henry Nevilleresident ambassador and senior representative in France
John Herbertprivy councillor, second secretary, civil lawyer, linguist
Robert BealePrivy Council clerk, precedent keeper, northern administrator
Thomas EdmondesFrench secretary and recent agent in France and Brussels

Herbert's memorandum on secretarial duties

A memorandum printed by G. W. Prothero and attributed probably to Herbert is headed “Titles of matters whereof I am charged to have regard as a Councillor and Secretary.” It says the secretary must:

“be acquainted with the particular actions and negotiations of ambassadors”

The list also includes treaties, Wales, the Council of the North, Ireland, military costs, the Council book, royal correspondence, and foreign princes.

This document is highly relevant to Neville because it defines diplomacy as a paper-and-information system. The secretary was expected not merely to write letters, but to understand previous negotiations, institutional jurisdictions, expenses, records, and the power of foreign states.

Boulogne as secretarial practice

The surviving Boulogne papers closely match Herbert's memorandum. The commissioners had to:

Herbert's presence therefore helps explain the procedural density of the correspondence. The next step is to identify whether his hand appears in the drafts now catalogued in Stowe MS 167 and other state-paper collections.

Later career

After Boulogne, Herbert:

The Welsh biography notes that he struggled as the principal defender of government policy in the Commons after Cecil moved to the Lords. After Salisbury's death he did not obtain the principal secretaryship and withdrew from active affairs while retaining the title.

He died at Cardiff on 9 July 1617.

Research significance

Herbert changes the interpretation of Boulogne. Neville did not negotiate alone with three generic assistants. He worked with a newly appointed secretary of state whose own memorandum defined the office through complete knowledge of treaties, ambassadors, councils, records, and foreign affairs.

This supplies a strong comparative framework for Neville's letters:

These questions can be pursued without assuming that Herbert authored Neville's dispatches or that Neville adopted Herbert's ideas.

Quoted Source Passages

The first establishes office. The second defines one category of secretarial knowledge and is used as a comparator for Boulogne practice.

Notes on Access

The Winwood and Prothero editions are public page-image witnesses. The manuscript behind the secretarial memorandum and Herbert's own working papers have not yet been image-checked for this packet.

Citations