Home / Topics / The Norreys Family and the Rycote Entertainment of 1592

The Norreys Family and the Rycote Entertainment of 1592

TBD Ready research packet

Topic: The Norreys Family and the Rycote Entertainment of 1592

Central finding

The Rycote entertainment transformed military absence into household performance. Henry and Margery Norreys's sons were dispersed across Ireland, Ostend, Brittany, and the sea coast. Instead of concealing those absences, the event made them its structure. Actors or messengers arrived in sequence, letters were read aloud, and jeweled military objects were delivered to the queen. The family represented service abroad—not proximity, courtly love, or fluent praise—as the best proof of loyalty.

The event was also an appeal for continuing employment and financial favour. The Norreys parents had incurred heavy costs supporting their sons' military careers. The sons' willingness to spend their blood in the queen's service is therefore both a martial ethic and a claim that such service deserved royal support.

Behind the masculine military display stood Margery Norreys's long friendship with Elizabeth. The entertainment calls her the queen's “Crow,” turns the house from a crow's nest into a phoenix nest, and uses that intimate alliance to advance the whole family.

The entertainment's language and performance form are examined separately in The 1592 Rycote Entertainment and Shakespeare. The accompanying illustrated parallels report sets the soldier-wooer rhetoric, misdirected letter, jeweled multilingual device procession, and controlled verbal correspondences beside full Folger passages.

Corrected chronology

Barnes's original heading reads:

The 28. of September, her Maiesty went fro Oxforde to Ricort.

The Folger court chronology places Elizabeth at Rycote from Thursday, 28 September, through Monday, 2 October 1592. The principal sequence was:

28 September: arrival from Oxford; Lord Norreys's old-soldier welcome;
Sunday, 1 October: music in the garden, the Irish and Flemish messengers,

the French page, five letters, gifts, Norreys's kneeling conclusion, music, and two unprinted sonnets;

Monday, 2 October: departure; the Jersey messenger and Catherine Paulet's

jeweled daisy.

The frequently repeated date 28 October 1592 is wrong. The primary heading and court itinerary both establish 28 September.

Why Rycote already mattered to Elizabeth

Rycote was not an unfamiliar progress stop. Margery's father, Sir John Williams, had custody of Princess Elizabeth under Mary and received her at Rycote during journeys to and from Woodstock. As queen, Elizabeth visited Rycote in 1566, 1568, 1570, and 1575 before returning in 1592.

The relationship was personal as well as ceremonial. A 1582 letter from Leicester to Hatton reports Margery's anger when an expected visit was cancelled. Leicester found her welcome cold because she believed that he and Hatton had prevented the queen from coming. In 1590 John Norreys wrote his mother that Elizabeth had asked repeatedly after her and:

wyshed her self at Rycott

Rycote's importance in 1592 therefore derived from repeated royal memory and Margery's durable access, not from the novelty of an unknown house.

The old soldier's opening: deeds against words

The “olde gentleman, sometimes a souldier” is Lord Norreys. His first sentence distinguishes Rycote from the mythological and pastoral rhetoric heard earlier on the progress:

after so many smooth speeches of Muses, to heare a rough hewen tale of a

souldier, wee vse not with wordes, to amplifie our conceites, and to pleade

faith by figures, but by deedes, to shew the loyalty of our harts, and to

make it good with our liues.

The declaration is artfully paradoxical: a carefully printed speech denounces mere speech. That paradox becomes the entertainment's method. Letters and mottoes repeatedly claim that swords, blood, wounds, commands, voyages, and absence are more trustworthy than poetic eloquence.

Norreys says that his horse, armour, shield, and sword have been taken by his “foure boies,” leaving him only prayer:

this is their resolution, and my desire, that their liues maye, be imployed

wholy in your seruice, and their deathes, bee their vowes sacrifice.

The line proved grimly prophetic. Most of the sons would die in or after royal military service during the next several years.

The Crow and the Phoenix

The same speech reveals the affective and political center of the household:

Their deathes, the rumour of which, hath so often affrighted the Crowe my

wife, that her hart, hath bene as blacke as her feathers.

Norreys then apologizes for the lodging:

although, nothing be more vnfit to lodge your Maiesty, then a crowes neste,

yet shall it be most happy to vs, that it is by your highnesse, made a

Phoenix neste.

The “Crow” is not a generic heraldic bird. The 1592 speech proves that Elizabeth's private nickname for Margery was already current five years before the queen's surviving 1597 condolence letter headed “Mine own Crow.” Kolkovich reads the paired birds as a personalized version of a familiar progress trope: the queen's presence transforms an inadequate provincial house into a center of political action. It also aligns the two women through bird imagery—Margery as Crow, Elizabeth as Phoenix.

The performance architecture: absent people made present

The 1592 print records three or four professional performers and musicians, but no large spectacle or building works. Its essential machinery was epistolary and material:

Dramatic route	Probable family voice	Object	Printed English rendering of motto
Irish lackey	Thomas Norreys in Ireland	Gold dart set with diamonds	“I flye onely for my soueraigne”
Skipper from Flanders	Edward Norreys, governor of Ostend	Gold key set with diamonds	“I onelie open to you”
French page, mistaken first letter	A soldier to “Lady Squemish”	No royal gift attached to the comic letter	—
French page, second letter	Henry Norreys preparing to sail	Gold sword set with diamonds and rubies	“Drawen onelie in your defence”
French page, third letter from sea coast	John Norreys preparing for Brittany	Diamond-set truncheon	“I doe not commaunde but vnder you”
Messenger from Jersey on departure	Catherine Norreys Paulet	Gold daisy set with rubies	No motto stated

The entertainment does not name the sons beside each letter. The identifications depend on location, office, object, motto, and known movements. Kolkovich and the modern Nichols's Progresses editors identify John as the voice of the final sea-coast letter; an older interpretation put John at Rycote. The itinerary makes Southampton and the Brittany expedition the better fit.

Thomas in Ireland: exile within an English heart

The Irish letter says that the wind's change allowed news of the royal visit to reach its writer. His ten-year absence has made him:

a stranger in mine owne countrye, and almost vnknowen to my best freinds,

onely remembred by her Maiestie.

He sends an Irish weapon with an English wish:

that in whose hart faith is not fastned, a Darte may.

The object compresses service abroad and national identity into one gift. An Irish dart carried by an Irish lackey attests the geographic distance; the English heart and the queen's memory pull that distant servant back into the household and nation.

Edward at Ostend: obedience and the key

The second military letter reports that its writer nearly sailed for England on hearing the news, but stopped:

to come without leaue, might be to returne without welcome.

The key is simultaneously a jewel, a military object, and a claim about command:

the Key of Ostend; & Ostend the Key of Flanders ... None shall turne it, but

who her Maiesty commands.

Presence at Rycote would actually have proved disobedience. Absence is made the visible sign that the son remains at his post.

The deliberately misdirected letter to Lady Squemish

The French page first produces a letter supposedly misaddressed to “the Lady Squemish” and therefore read before the queen. It is a comic anti-love letter:

we proue it by the sword, others, by their Sonets, theirs inke, blacke for

colde, ours bloud, redde for heate.

The soldier refuses the ritual idolatry of the Petrarchan lover:

I cannot be so superstitious as these nice louers, who make the pax of their

mistris hands, tis flat popery.

He will not have his tongue “ringed” at his mistress's ear like a jewel and ends because “the winde calls me away.” The letter separates romantic inconstancy from political fidelity. The wind that moves the soldiers through the other letters also blows away this lover's affections; service to sovereign and country supersedes the endless performance of desire.

Henry and John: eloquence, sword, wind, and command

The sword letter makes the central opposition explicit:

Eloquence & I, am vowde enemies, loialty & I, sworne brothers, what my words

cannot effect, my sworde shall.

The last letter describes the writer's choice between riding post to Rycote and using the long-awaited wind for Brittany:

necessitye controled affection, that bid me vnlesse I could kepe the winde

in a bagge, to vse the windes when they blew.

He sends his truncheon, “the honour which I receiued of her Maiestie,” and declares that she alone commands him. The sequence turns Elizabeth into a military commander rather than a Petrarchan mistress. Her authority operates through leave, commissions, offices, ships, winds, and distant posts.

Catherine and the gendered ending

After the sons' gifts, Norreys complains that his daughter, “the Mistris of a Moole hill,” has forgotten her duty:

I doubt not her excuse, because shee is a woman, but feare the truth of it,

because it must be to her soueraigne.

On Monday morning a messenger from Jersey repairs the apparent omission with a gold daisy. He speaks for Catherine and says:

it hath no sweetnes, yet manie vertues, her hart no tongue, but infinite

affections.

The contrast with Bisham is sharp. At Bisham the likely Russell daughters speak at length and present themselves as counselors. At Rycote, Margery is present but silent, and Catherine's “heart” requires a male messenger's tongue. Yet that silence should not obscure Margery's practical power. Her friendship with Elizabeth made the visit, audience, and family's appeal possible. Kolkovich's complete 2009 article makes the comparative point precisely: male-hosted entertainments could still create and maintain political relationships between aristocratic women and the queen, even when the printed script withheld those women's own speeches.

Financial pressure and the bid for employment

Kolkovich places the performance during a period when the family had incurred debt supporting the sons' campaigns and could not freely liquidate lands engaged to the queen. The repeated language of total sacrifice therefore has an economic edge. The entertainment seeks:

continued military commands and offices for the sons;
confidence after episodes of royal displeasure or insubordination;
recognition that the household had already spent resources and lives in

Protestant war;

favour toward the parents whose estate and emotional life bore the cost.

The gifts are expensive, but they are not random luxuries. Each converts an office or theater of war into a miniature jeweled emblem that the queen can hold.

Rycote in print: regionalism and militant Protestantism

Joseph Barnes's volume was the only known collection of multiple Elizabethan country-house entertainments and the only one printed outside London. Kolkovich argues that compilation changed the meaning of the individual events. Barnes's title calls them “Speeches,” presenting local performances as political conferences between monarch and regional elites.

Read beside Bisham, the Rycote letters reinforce a militant Protestant geography. France, Flanders, Ireland, Brittany, Ostend, and the sea coast surround an English household whose dispersed members insist that foreign service remains centered on Elizabeth. The printed collection asks Oxford readers to see country-house performance as political literature, not ephemeral court gossip.

The direct Neville nexus

Rycote is not only adjacent to the Neville world. On 26 October 1592, less than one month after the entertainment, Lord Norreys wrote from Rycote to Sir Henry Neville the elder at Billingbear. The primary letter asks Neville, as deputy lieutenant of Berkshire and a man with Windsor connections, to help renew a lease of tithes belonging to the Dean and Canons of Windsor. Norreys subscribed himself:

Yoʳ veary assured Affyne

Henry Norreys

The exact marriage chain behind “Affyne” remains unresolved and must not be invented. The letter nevertheless establishes a direct, contemporary relationship between the Rycote host and Henry Neville's father. REED's Berkshire survey provides the wider control: the Norris, Neville, Hoby, Knollys, and Unton families formed an interconnected Protestant governing network across Berkshire and adjoining Oxfordshire.

The combination is important:

Bisham belonged to Anne Killigrew Neville's Cooke–Hoby kin;
Rycote's host dealt directly and affinally with Henry Neville's father;
Barnes's Oxford book printed both households together as part of one

progress and one regional political geography.

None of this establishes that the younger Henry attended, devised, or wrote the entertainment.

Recovering a vanished performance environment

The Rycote setting requires archival reconstruction because the great house in which Elizabeth was received no longer survives intact. The Bodleian's Rediscovering Rycote project reports that the house was sold at auction on 1 June 1807 and then dismantled brick by brick, leaving only a fragment of the building. The project draws together maps, drawings, estate papers, accounts, and other evidence from more than fifty Bodleian collections. Its digital reconstruction is therefore an essential control on any attempt to place the 1592 speeches within gates, gardens, approaches, chambers, or other parts of the estate.

This loss matters interpretively. The printed text gives a sequence of arrivals, messengers, letters, and presented objects, but the spatial intervals between those actions are no longer recoverable merely by visiting the present site. Future work should align each speech with the Bodleian maps and architectural evidence, while keeping conjectural blocking distinct from what Barnes's text actually says.

The missing thirty-soldiers letter

A 1917 Myers & Co. catalogue describes a one-page Lord Norreys letter from Rycote to Sir Henry Neville about wages for thirty soldiers “in connection with his entertainment of Queen Elizabeth at Rycote in 1592.” The dealer prints the date as 8 October 1599. The manuscript has not been recovered, and the catalogue may have supplied the entertainment connection itself.

The item must remain separate from Barnes's script, which mentions no group of thirty soldiers. Its date and recipient are unresolved: