New River Project
Mixed Needs Review evidence packet
Topic: New River Project
1. Verified Sourced Facts
- The old local wiki page is only a source trail. It identifies New River, a Legal History as the relevant source for Neville's New River connection, but it does not itself provide evidence beyond that link.
- Leslie Tomory's The History of the London Water Industry, 1580-1820 summarizes the earliest New River share evidence as the sale of two shares to Sir Henry Neville in
1612for£100each, with further sums due if company expenses exceeded£6,400. - Tomory's note identifies the underlying agreement as
1612-05-08and cites Bernard Rudden's The New River: A Legal History, appendix E, pp.274-278. - Rudden appendix E prints a
Share Issuedated8 May 1612. - The printed share issue is between Hugh Middleton, citizen and goldsmith of London, and
Sir Henry Nevill of Billingsbear in the countie of Berks Knight. - Rudden's printed text says Sir Henry Nevill "is and hathe beene an adventurer in the said worke."
- The printed text says Sir Henry Nevill had paid
two hundred poundsto Hugh Middleton before the sealing and delivery of the instrument. - The printed text grants Sir Henry Nevill
two full and intire six and thirtieth partesof the waterworks, river, new cut, and profits, after the King's half-share is excepted. - The printed text requires Neville to bear a proportional charge if the work cost more than
£3,200; this is expressed as afull sixteenth parteof the surplus charge. - The printed witnesses on the share issue are
Ni: Hyde,Will: Staverton, andWm: Neast. - BRO/Royal Berkshire
D/EN/O24now gives direct manuscript-transcription support for the payment lane.Doc_47d_D_EN_O_24.mdpreserves two receipts tied to the New River project: 18 May 1612: Hugh Myddelton receives£50from Sir Henry Nevill of Billingbear toward bringing a river or water stream from the springs of Chadwell and Amwell toward London, according to an indenture dated8 Maylast past.2 December 1613: Henry Myddelton receives another£50from Sir Henry Nevill of Billingbear toward a further supply for the same work, explicitly referring to an indenture dated8 Mayin James's tenth regnal year.- The two
Doc_47dreceipt images,IMG_8425andIMG_8424, were visually spot-checked on2026-05-29; the key names, dates,£50sums, Chadwell/Amwell wording, and8 Mayindenture references are visible in the images. - Other
D/EN/O24documents belong in a related but distinct lane: Doc_47c_D_EN_O_24.mdis a26 November 1610Henry Myddelton receipt to Sir Henry Neville for a Sarum/Salisbury water project, not direct New River evidence.Doc_47b_D_EN_O_24.mdis a29 July 1613Henry Myddelton letter from Sarum about the Close watercourse, trench, fountain, cistern, and lead pipes. It is related Myddelton/waterworks evidence, not a New River receipt.Doc_47a_D_EN_O_24.mdis an28 April 1614rent receipt for a house in Salisbury Close paid by John Aldworth; it is contextual for the Sarum property/waterworks cluster, not New River evidence.- The
1612Sir Henry Nevill in the share issue and receipts is most likely the elder Sir Henry Neville of Billingbear, not Henry Neville III. The younger Neville was knighted by this point, but the elder was alive until July1615and is the controlling identification unless a source says otherwise. - Duncan's 1974 dissertation adds useful secondary context for the New River political-network lane. Citing
Neville MSS,D/En/O24, ff.1-3, Duncan says Neville purchased two shares on8 May 1612for£200, had additional liability for surplus charges, paid at least£300into the company according to receipts, and sold£67worth of elms for use as water pipes. - Duncan also connects this business relationship to the 1614 Commons context through Robert Middleton, brother of Hugh Myddelton. This is a suggestive political-network interpretation; the direct evidence still proves investment/payment and timber sale, not parliamentary advocacy for the New River.
- Local BRO website verification update,
2026-06-10: the O24 New River and Sarum/Salisbury records are present in the local website data with images and no missing-image flags. The verified split isDoc_47dfor direct New River receipts, andDoc_47a-Doc_47cfor Salisbury/Sarum context.IMG_8425.jpegwas visually spot-checked for the Hugh Myddelton receipt. - The estate-settlement lane adds two related controls outside O24.
Doc_01_D_EN_F6_1_19.md, a30 April 1615feoffment/trust abstract, treats water-works shares as trust assets alongside Indico and family provision.Doc_20c_D_EN_F6_1_16_Neville_Lawrence_Waltham_draft.mdtreats the waterwork benefit as a potentially growing estate asset, but it remains P0/PARTIAL and should not be quoted before line collation.
2. Evidence Lanes
| Lane | Current support | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| New River share issue | Rudden appendix E, pp. 274-278; Tomory p. 75 summary | Printed source checked visually/OCR; original indenture still pending |
| New River payment receipts | BRO Doc_47d, 18 May 1612 and 2 Dec. 1613, D/EN/O24 | Direct manuscript-transcription support; key image readings spot-checked |
| Sarum/Salisbury waterworks | BRO Doc_47c receipt and Doc_47b letter | Related Myddelton/waterworks context, but not direct New River evidence; Doc_47b is P1 in the BRO audit |
| Sarum property/rent | BRO Doc_47a receipt | Contextual only |
| Water-works as trust asset | BRO Doc_01, D/EN/F6/1/19, 30 Apr. 1615 | Strong estate-settlement control; not an operating-company record by itself |
| Waterwork benefit in estate planning | BRO Doc_20c, D/EN/F6/1/16 | High-value lead but P0/PARTIAL; line-collate before quotation |
| Henry Neville III later New River membership | History of Parliament-style biography elsewhere in corpus | Separate post-1615 claim; direct company witness still pending |
| Coriolanus context | Related play packet | Thematic/civic-infrastructure analogy only; does not prove source use or dating |
3. Ken Feinstein Twitter and Blog Information
- No Ken Feinstein Twitter/blog material is isolated in this packet at present.
4. Quoted Source Text
Rudden appendix E
- "E. Share Issue"
- "8 May 1612"
- "Sir Henry Nevill of Billingsbear in the countie of Berks Knight"
- "is and hathe beene an adventurer in the said worke"
- "two hundred pounds"
- "two full and intire six and thirtieth partes"
- "a full sixteenth parte"
Tomory
- "the sale of two shares to Sir Henry Neville in 1612 for £100 each"
- "Agreement with Sir Henry Neville to sell shares. (1612-05-08)"
BRO / Royal Berkshire D/EN/O24
Doc_47d: "Sir Henry Nevill of Billingbere"Doc_47d: "ffyftie poundes"Doc_47d: "from the springes of Chadwell and Amwell towards the Cittie of London"Doc_47d: "according to a Covenant contayned in an Indenture dated the Eight day of May last past"Doc_47d: "according to A Covenant contayned in an Indentur[e] dated the Eight day of May"Doc_47b: "the water course runne through"Doc_47b: "The fountayne is also built"Doc_47c: "the North gate of the Cittie of Sarum"
BRO / Royal Berkshire estate-waterwork controls
Doc_01: "Two full and cleare fiue and thirtie parts of y^e water-works"Doc_01: "the Indico and water-workes"Doc_20c: "the benefitt of the new act or waterworke is like to grow & increase"
Duncan dissertation
- "Neville purchased two shares"
- "29 adventurers who shared 36 shares"
- "£67 worth of elms"
5. Citations
- "New River Project." Henry Neville Research Wiki,
23 Oct. 2019, http://nevilleresearch.com/index.php?title=New_River_Project. Local preservation: wiki_new_river_project.md. - Tomory, Leslie. The History of the London Water Industry, 1580-1820. Johns Hopkins University Press,
2017, p.75and notes37-38. Local PDF: TEXTO.06.TheHistLondonWater.pdf. - Rudden, Bernard. The New River: A Legal History. Oxford: Clarendon Press,
1985. Appendix E,Share Issue,8 May 1612, pp.274-278. Local PDF excerpt: Rudden_New_River_Appendix_E_Share_Issue_1612.pdf. - Draft OCR and rendered page images for Rudden appendix E: Rudden_New_River_Appendix_E_Share_Issue_1612_OCR_DRAFT.md and page_images.
- Hugh and Henry Myddelton receipts to Sir Henry Neville,
18 May 1612and2 Dec. 1613,D/EN/O24: Doc_47d_D_EN_O_24.md. Key images spot-checked: IMG_8425.jpeg and IMG_8424.jpeg. - Duncan, Owen Lowe, Jr. The Political Career of Sir Henry Neville: An Elizabethan Gentleman at the Court of James I. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University,
1974, esp. ch. 7, p.276/ book p.268in the combined transcription. Original PDF: DUNCAN OL 1974 7424317.pdf. Full Antigravity transcription: DUNCAN_OL_1974_7424317_combined.md. - Henry Myddelton receipt to Sir Henry Neville,
26 Nov. 1610,D/EN/O24: Doc_47c_D_EN_O_24.md. Image spot-check path: IMG_8423.jpeg. - Henry Myddelton to Sir Henry Neville, Sarum,
29 July 1613,D/EN/O24: Doc_47b_D_EN_O_24.md. - Henry Myddelton to John Aldworth, rent receipt,
28 Apr. 1614,D/EN/O24: Doc_47a_D_EN_O_24.md. - Neville feoffment/trust abstract with water-works and Indico interests,
30 Apr. 1615,D/EN/F6/1/19: Doc_01_D_EN_F6_1_19.md. - Neville Lawrence Waltham / waterwork draft instructions,
D/EN/F6/1/16: Doc_20c_D_EN_F6_1_16_Neville_Lawrence_Waltham_draft.md. - Local BRO/RBA verification dossier for Duncan leads: DUNCAN_BRO_LOCAL_WEBSITE_VERIFICATION_2026-06-10.md.
- business_interests.md, related business-lanes packet.
- play_coriolanus.md, related play packet for the New River / civic-provision analogy.
- sir_henry_neville_iii_1588_1629.md, related packet for the elder/younger Neville distinction.
- bro_transcriptions_source_dossier.md, source map for the BRO/Royal Berkshire transcription corpus.
6. Notes on Access
- This packet now separates direct New River evidence from the Sarum/Salisbury waterworks material in the same BRO
D/EN/O24group. - Do not cite
Doc_47borDoc_47cas New River evidence. They show Neville dealing with Henry Myddelton on water infrastructure at Sarum/Salisbury. - The strongest New River evidence is the convergence of Rudden appendix E, Tomory's summary, and the
Doc_47dreceipts. - The 1615
Doc_01trust abstract andDoc_20cdraft show the waterwork interest as an estate asset. They strengthen the business/estate context but do not replace New River company/share evidence. - The claim that Neville was a parliamentary advocate or debater of the New River project remains unverified here. Current checked evidence proves investment/payment, not parliamentary advocacy.
- Duncan supports using New River as a business-and-network context for Neville's 1612-1614 parliamentary world, but this remains secondary interpretation unless the Middleton/Phelips/Berkeley parliamentary links are independently sourced.
- The Rudden appendix is a copyrighted printed source. Use short snippets only unless a final citation apparatus obtains permission or substitutes a public-domain manuscript witness.
- The elder/younger distinction matters. The
1612share issue and receipts should be assigned to the elder Sir Henry Neville unless contrary evidence appears. Henry Neville III's later New River Company membership remains a separate post-1615claim.