Home / Topics / John Taverner: Crown woods surveyor, experimental author, and the Sonning–Richmond timber operation

John Taverner: Crown woods surveyor, experimental author, and the Sonning–Richmond timber operation

Primary Source With Public Controls Active deep research topic

Central finding

John Taverner should no longer appear in the Sonning timber topic as a name inside one difficult warrant clause. He was a Crown woods surveyor whose surviving paper trail concerns timber scarcity, illegal spoil, park and forest inventories, surveys, and waste caused by park construction. Bibliographical sources also identify a John Taverner who died in 1606 as the author of Certaine experiments concerning fish and fruite (1600), a short practical book explicitly based on the author's own observation and practice.

The combination is directly relevant to Mathew Crypps's 1606 certificate. Crypps was reporting thousands of Sonning trees felled for royal fuel, bridges, mills, tenements and park pales. His clause naming m[r] Taverner his Surveyor belongs to a much larger culture of measured natural resources and Crown improvement.

This does not prove that Henry Neville read Taverner's book, knew him socially, or shared his experiments. It establishes that a practical experimental author was also a Crown woods officer operating in the same administrative chain that produced Neville's Sonning papers.

Taverner in the Crypps certificate

Royal Berkshire Archives D/EN/O12/43 is Mathew Crypps's return, dated at Hurst on 26 November 1606, of trees felled within the manor of Sonning during the preceding two years. The directly inspected manuscript contains a clause describing:

A warrant from the Lord Treasurer directed to m[r] Taverner his Surveyor

The clause belongs to the felling for the Richmond park pale. The exact manuscript is damaged and compressed, but the office and surname are visible in the primary image and independently controlled by the printed State Papers entry.

On 6 May 1605 the calendar records two consecutive warrants:

“Warrant to fell 216 trees within the manor of Sunning, cos. Berks

and Oxford, for finishing the park pale at Richmond.”

and:

“Warrant to pay 56l. 13s. 8d. to John Taverner, Surveyor of

the Woods, for timber for the park at Richmond.”

The calendar does more than identify a name. It specifies Taverner's office, the number of trees, the two-county manor, the destination and his payment. Crypps's later certificate is the local execution record for at least part of that warrant.

An inherited Crown woods career

The Dictionary of National Biography entry for Richard Taverner supplies a compact family history. Richard's brother Roger Taverner became surveyor-general of the King's woods south of Trent around 1540. Roger's son John, who died in 1606, was likewise:

“surveyor of woods and forests”

and the entry points to numerous forestry letters in the Lansdowne manuscripts.

This was therefore not an isolated appointment. The Taverner family had at least two generations of Crown expertise in woods south of Trent. That geographical jurisdiction fits the southern forests and royal parks named in John's surviving papers and the Sonning–Richmond operation.

The British Library paper trail

The British Library's public catalogue reveals a concentrated group of John Taverner's working papers.

Lansdowne MS 43, 1585

The catalogue lists:

These descriptions show three linked functions: diagnose scarcity, prosecute spoil, and inventory the resource system.

Lansdowne MS 62, 1589–90

The next group includes:

The second item is particularly close to Crypps's later subject. The construction and repair of park boundaries could consume Crown timber on a large scale. Taverner's earlier complaint about waste for park mounds should be compared with the 1605 authorization of 216 Sonning trees to finish Richmond's pale and with Crypps's separate 68-tree return for the Easthampstead pale.

The comparison may reveal how the Crown distinguished necessary park works from destructive or unauthorized consumption.

Certaine experiments concerning fish and fruite

In 1600 a John Taverner, gentleman, published:

*Certaine experiments concerning fish and fruite: Practised by John

Taverner Gentleman, and by him published for the benefit of others.*

The title page says it was printed for William Ponsonby. The Folger bibliography assigns the printing to Richard Field and identifies the book as STC 23708.

The preface to the reader gives a clear statement of method:

in seeking to shun that Monster Idlenes, and having a desire by all honest

meanes possible, to benefit this my native countrie of England ... I have

thought good to set downe some experiments that my selfe have had concerning

fish and fruite

Taverner distinguishes his book from learned works produced by foreign authors in different climates. He says he will present:

onely what things my selfe have observed and practised.

The epistemic claim is practical, local and experimental. Authority comes from things done and observed in English conditions, not merely from inherited book-learning.

The dedication is dated 22 January 1600 and addressed to Sir Edmund Anderson, Lord Chief Justice of Common Pleas. Taverner says the judge's interest in a recent husbandry book encouraged him to place his own observations under Anderson's protection. The publication therefore joins practical husbandry, law, patronage and the printed book trade.

Is the author the Crown surveyor?

Several bibliographical sources identify the author as John Taverner, d.1606, the same death year given for the Crown woods surveyor in the DNB. The Goldsmiths'-Kress catalogue does so explicitly. The match is persuasive:

Even so, the identity should not yet be called signature-verified. The ideal control would compare the book's dedication signature, a surviving office letter and probate or burial evidence. Until that comparison is made, the responsible formulation is: bibliographical tradition strongly identifies the 1600 author with John Taverner, Crown woods surveyor, who died in 1606.

The productive connection to Neville's papers

The important connection is not a speculative literary association. It is a shared administrative problem.

Taverner's catalogue trail asks:

Crypps's Sonning certificate answers the same kind of questions at local scale:

Neville's papers therefore preserve not merely a timber list but the local end of a Crown knowledge system in which surveyors, warranting ministers, copyholders, park keepers and manorial officials converted woods into measured fuel and construction resources.

Book-history significance

The Folger bibliography attributes the printing to Richard Field for William Ponsonby. Both names belong to major literary-print networks, but the fact should be used carefully. It establishes the commercial and typographical route of Taverner's book, not a personal connection among Taverner, Neville and any dramatist.

The productive research question is narrower: did Crown officers who produced technical surveys also use literary publishers to circulate practical knowledge? Comparable books by surveyors, foresters, gardeners, engineers and estate officers may clarify the genre and readership of Taverner's work.

Chronology problem: the 1608 survey copy

The British Library catalogues Add MS 38444 as containing a copy dated 1608 of a John Taverner survey of royal woods, together with observations on husbandry and the King's woods associated with 1606. Because the surveyor is reported to have died in 1606, the later date requires caution. It could represent:

The item must be inspected before it is used to extend the surveyor's life or career beyond 1606.

Research programme

Image the forestry papers

Lansdowne MSS 43/58, 43/59, 43/65, 62/2 and 62/60 should be obtained as a single person packet. Their language may provide distinctive terms for scarcity, spoil, survey, park works and accounting that can then be searched across the Sonning archive and State Papers.

Recover the 1605 account

The £56 13s. 8d. payment should have generated a warrant, account, receipt, estimate or voucher. That document may show the price per tree, carriage, labour, measurement, named woods, named local agents and the exact relation between Taverner and Crypps.

Compare technical language with the printed book

A controlled comparison should test whether the forestry papers and Certaine experiments share habits of enumeration, observation, qualification and practical instruction. This is a biographical and intellectual-history question, not an authorship attribution exercise.

Establish the author's identity directly

Locate Taverner's will, burial record and autograph signatures. Compare them with the dedication, Lansdowne letters and surviving office papers.

Reconstruct the surveyor's network

Search Taverner with Thomas Sackville, Sir Thomas Gorges, Charles Howard, William Christmas, Mathew Crypps, Gerard Lytton and other named park and woods officers. The goal is to reconstruct who measured, warranted, felled, carried, paid for and certified Crown timber.

Public sources