Home / Topics / Gowrie, Lord Hume, Tiery, and Neville's Scottish Passage Recommendations, 1600–1601

Gowrie, Lord Hume, Tiery, and Neville's Scottish Passage Recommendations, 1600–1601

Mixed Needs Review evidence packet

Scottish passage through Neville: a corrected chronology

Sourced Facts

In late February 1600 Neville recommended John Ruthven, earl of Gowrie, to Cecil, saying he knew him well and had “good communication” with him. Neville urged Cecil to question Gowrie about feared alterations in Scotland and supplied a broad passport. A separate March letter recommended Lord Hume. Neville's August response to news of Gowrie's death belongs after this documented contact.

These letters prove acquaintance, recommendation, travel paperwork, and Neville's stated intelligence concern. They do not prove that Gowrie disclosed anything to Cecil or that Neville had advance knowledge of the later Gowrie affair.

February 1600/1: Tiery—not February 1600

The Tiery recommendation must be separated chronologically. Neville's Rochester letter is dated 27 February 1600 in Old Style, which is 27 February 1601 in modern dating. The Hatfield calendar places related Tiery passport material on 19 February 1600/1. Tiery had formerly attended Lord Hume in Paris, had since become an exempt in Henry IV's guard, carried Winwood's recommendation, and sought quiet passage toward Scotland.

This correction means Tiery is evidence of a later continuing Hume–Winwood–Neville passage channel; he is not a same-week companion to Neville's pre-Gowrie recommendations. Any corpus or itinerary entry normalizing the Rochester letter to 27 February 1600 should be corrected or explicitly marked Old Style.

Quoted Source Text

Neville says of Gowrie:

“I know him well, and have had good communication with him.”

Tiery's letter is explicitly dated at Rochester “the 27th of February 1600.” Because England still began the legal year on 25 March, that original date is 27 February 1601 in modern dating.

Source boundary

Exempt is a rank or office in the royal guard context, not a claim that Tiery was legally exempt from ordinary obligations. His identity and actual return remain unresolved.

Citations

Winwood, Memorials, vol. 1, pp. 141–148, Gowrie and Hume sequence.
HMC, Calendar of the Manuscripts of the Marquis of Salisbury, vol. 11, pp. 73–74, Tiery entries.

Notes on Access

The two public volumes control the printed chronology. The autograph Tiery letter should retain both its literal date, 27 February 1600, and its modern date, 27 February 1601. Corpus v22 now corrects the bad v17 date_ns normalization to 1601-02-27 while preserving the literal Old Style dateline.